“first open­ly ass­ho­le pre­si­dent”

felix schwenzel in wirres.net/en

in the last cou­ple of days, the­re was a lot of talk about in­sults and har­rass­ment, espe­cia­ly on face­book and twit­ter.

two month ago, when i wat­ched jon ste­warts dai­ly show, i was ama­zed how jon ste­wart loves to in­sult peo­p­le he dis­li­kes. this is pret­ty evi­dent, when ste­wart starts to talk about do­nald trump. ho­we­ver, the sheer fre­quen­cy in which ste­wart cal­led trump an ass­ho­le was ama­zing.

rol­lings­tone.com:

In a se­cond seg­ment de­di­ca­ted to Trump, Dai­ly Show se­ni­or elec­tion cor­re­spon­dent Jor­dan Klep­per talks about how The Do­nald, if elec­ted, could be “our first open­ly ass­ho­le Pre­si­dent.” Klep­per then says that while Nixon was a “ga­ping ass­ho­le, but clo­se­ted,” Trump “says it loud and proud.” The seg­ment also fea­tured a ca­meo ap­pearance by no­ted “ass­ho­le” Paul Rudd.

in ger­ma­ny lots of peo­p­le say, cri­ti­cism should be fac­tu­al. ger­mans even ex­pect co­me­di­ans to be fac­tu­al. and in­de­ed, it is more or less im­pos­si­ble to call so­meone an ass­ho­le, wi­t­hout fa­cing le­gal con­se­quen­ces. the­re is only one way to call so­meone an ass­ho­le wi­t­hout con­se­quen­ces: call yours­elf an ass­ho­le. from time to time i do so.

(ger­man ver­si­on)