links vom 01.10.2014

felix schwenzel

  theat­lan­tic.com: The Il­lu­si­on of "Na­tu­ral“   #

eula biss:

Our breast milk, it turns out, is as pol­lu­ted as our en­vi­ron­ment at lar­ge. La­bo­ra­to­ry ana­ly­sis of breast milk has de­tec­ted paint thin­ners, dry-clea­ning fluids, fla­me re­tar­dants, pe­sti­ci­des, and ro­cket fuel. “Most of the­se che­mi­cals are found in mi­cro­sco­pic amounts," the jour­na­list Flo­rence Wil­liams no­tes, “but if hu­man milk were sold at the lo­cal Pig­gly Wig­gly, some stock would ex­ceed fe­de­ral food-safe­ty le­vels for DDT re­si­dues and PCBs."

im prin­zip sind wir so neu­ro­tisch und ängs­ter­füllt vom un­sicht­ba­ren, wie un­se­re vor­fah­ren vor hun­der­ten von jah­ren. un­se­re ängs­te nen­nen wir jetzt nur an­ders:

Fear of to­xi­ci­ty strikes me as an old an­xie­ty with a new name. Whe­re the word filth once sug­gested, with its mo­ra­list air, the evils of the fle­sh, the word to­xic now con­demns the che­mi­cal evils of our in­dus­tri­al world. This is not to say that con­cerns over en­vi­ron­men­tal pol­lu­ti­on are not ju­s­ti­fied--like filth theo­ry, to­xi­ci­ty theo­ry is an­cho­red in le­gi­ti­ma­te dan­gers--but that the way we think about to­xi­ci­ty be­ars some re­sem­blan­ce to the way we once thought about filth. Both theo­ries al­low their sub­scri­bers to main­tain a sen­se of con­trol over their own he­alth by pur­suing per­so­nal pu­ri­ty. For the filth theo­rist, this me­ans a retre­at into the home, whe­re hea­vy curta­ins and shut­ters might seal out the smell of the poor and their pro­blems. Our ver­si­on of this shut­te­ring is now achie­ved th­rough the purcha­se of pu­ri­fied wa­ter, air pu­ri­fiers, and food pro­du­ced with the pro­mi­se of pu­ri­ty.

wun­der­ba­rer text, aus dem ich ab­satz­wei­se zi­tie­ren wol­len wür­de, der ver­sucht uns we­nigs­tens ein biss­chen zu er­den und uns un­se­re di­ver­sen aber­glau­ben von „na­tür­lich­keit“, „che­mi­ka­li­en“ und „gif­ten“ zu neh­men.

  netz­po­li­tik.org: Di­gi­tal­kom­mis­sar-Kan­di­dat Oet­tin­ger will eine Auf­hol­jagd. Und sich da­für Zeit las­sen.   #

gute über­schrift und gute zu­sam­men­fas­sung von anna bi­sel­li zur be­fra­gung von EU di­gi­tal­kom­mis­sar-kan­di­dat gün­ther oet­tin­ger. et­was mei­nungs­freu­di­ger war chris­ti­an stö­cker auf spie­gel.de.

  time.com: Ce­le­bri­ty Lea­k­ed Pho­tos 2014: Har­vard Sex Blog­ger on Her Re­ven­ge Porn   #

lena chen:

The non­con­sen­su­al pos­ting of my pho­tos was a ter­ro­ri­zing in­va­si­on of pri­va­cy that al­te­red my rea­li­ty and ir­re­vo­ca­bly ch­an­ged the way I live, think and wri­te

  twit­ter.com/sa­mu­el_wade: Sad to see HK pro­tes­ters re­sort­ing to vio­lins.   #

Sad to see HK pro­tes­ters re­sort­ing to vio­lins. pic.twit­ter.com/17cGBX­He­RO

— Sa­mu­el Wade (@sa­mu­el_wade) Sep­tem­ber 29, 2014

  hau­ckund­bau­er.blog­spot.com: Ist es nicht ein Glück...? (FAS, 28.Sep­tem­ber 2014)   #