kategorie: favoriten ×

Ich ver­mis­se ehr­li­che, dra­ma­ti­sche, ro­man­ti­sche, wahr­haf­ti­ge Ernst­haf­tig­keit. Ich kann die­se gan­ze zy­ni­sche Ka­cke nicht mehr er­tra­gen.

John­ny Haeus­ler (@spree­blick) 06.06.2016 22:59

@di­plix di­gi­day.com/pu­blishers/pub…

Pu­blic (@pu­blic­tors­ten) 06.06.2016 10:11

span­nend: der nach­bar von ne­ben­an ver­sucht ge­ra­de sei­ne woh­nung durch den brief­schlitz zu ver­las­sen

ka­tia (@kne­tag­abo) 01.06.2016 18:29

Re­qui­si­ten für Quarks & Cas­pers – ich wer­de ein groß­ar­ti­ges Wo­chen­en­de ha­ben. pic.twit­ter.com/vG49YfOpeC

Ralph Cas­pers (@hy­per­jinx) 30.05.2016 17:34

#ham­burg #ham­mer­brook

ma­xi­mi­li­an bud­den­bohm (@bud­den­bohm) 06.06.2016 9:00

#grau­bün­den

(@sing­putt) 06.06.2016 9:08

(@sing­putt) 06.06.2016 9:04

(@sing­putt) 06.06.2016 9:02

(@sing­putt) 06.06.2016 9:02

  Bridging the In­die­Web Ge­ne­ra­ti­on Gap

A week or two ago Ke­vin Marks poin­ted the IWC chan­nel to a must-read talk cal­led In­es­sen­ti­al Weird­ness in Open Source gi­ven by Sum­a­na Ha­ri­ha­res­wa at OSCON this year. Weird­nes­ses are quirks of your pro­ject, com­mu­ni­ty, or cul­tu­re that might in­ti­mi­da­te/dis­cou­ra­ge new­co­mers. Es­sen­ti­al weird­nes­ses are foun­da­tio­nal; wi­t­hout them, you'd be do­ing a dif­fe­rent thing. In­es­sen­ti­al weird­nes­ses are ever­y­thing else, lo­sing them might slow you down or make it less fun, but it would­n't ch­an­ge any fun­da­men­tal aspect of the pro­ject. She makes a point of say­ing that in­es­sen­ti­al does­n't mean un­im­portant or bad - your weird tools (ahem, git) help you get stuff done; jar­gon is useful short­hand; in-jo­kes are part of a group's cul­tu­re.

Stün­de es nicht im Grund­ge­setz, wäre die Aus­sa­ge "Die Wür­de des Men­schen ist un­an­tast­bar" heu­te wohl als "links­extrem" ein­ge­stuft.

GA (@toll­wut­be­zirk) 02.06.2016 9:27

lasst uns über ras­sis­mus re­den. aber nur mit wei­ßen men­schen und la­den wir ei­nen noch ras­sis­ten ein: twit­ter.com/se­ba­so/sta­tus/… #an­ne­will

Mi­cha­el See­mann (@ms­pro) 05.06.2016 9:38

  Ta­king an on­line book off­line

Ap­pli­ca­ti­on Cache is- as Jake so in­fa­mously de­scri­bed -not a good API. It was spec­ced and ship­ped be­fo­re de­ve­lo­pers had a chan­ce to fi­gu­re out what they re­al­ly nee­ded, and so App­Cache tur­ned out to be frus­t­ra­ting at best and down­right dan­ge­rous in some si­tua­tions. Its over-ze­a­lous caching com­bi­ned with its by­zan­ti­ne cache in­va­li­da­ti­on en­su­red it was never go­ing to be­co­me a main­stream tech­no­lo­gy. The­re are very few use-ca­ses for App­Cache, but I think I hit upon one of them. Six ye­ars ago, A Book Apart pu­blished HTML5 For Web De­si­gners. A year and a half la­ter, I put the book on­line.

Haus am Was­ser

Ma­rio Six­tus 馬六 (@six­tus) 04.06.2016 23:43

Flower Fries #in­sta­food #fries #yum­my #in­sta­food #food­porn #home­coo­king #ho­me­ma­de #dai­sies #chi­ves

Be­ne­dikt Koeh­ler (@fu­ru­ka­ma) 05.06.2016 0:12

You have to walk up a steep hill but then at least you have a view. #no­fil­ter #al­wayssf

Dia­na @Zu­fall (@zu­fael­li­ge­wie­der­ga­be) 05.06.2016 6:19

Max von We­bel (@343max) 05.06.2016 7:23

ich so: hast du dei­nen blind­darm ei­gent­lich noch?
er so: wie­so, willst du den ha­ben?

ka­tia (@kne­tag­abo) 04.06.2016 12:53

Ich kann nichts da­ge­gen tun. pic.twit­ter.com/pEZhMiR­mxH

Meia (@olle_Meia) 02.06.2016 15:48

c. hei­land @ brau­se­boys

ka­tia (@ka­ti­as_bil­der) 02.06.2016 23:18

Trump Ral­ly. pic.twit­ter.com/F1QVSGwJYU

Art of Ste­phen Byr­ne (@Ste­phen­Byr­ne86) 30.05.2016 1:58