(via)
Get the main content of any page as Markdown.
bookmarks
The Atmosphere is an ecosystem that respects your agency as a user, and it’s one of many ways we can start taking back control of our online experiences. Whether you’re a user or a builder, you no longer need to hold onto hope that a giant company does the right thing for you. You can take your Everything Account across The Atmosphere without the permission of any other entity.
diese eingebettete grafik ist gut.
The newsletter is now distributed via Buttondown, an email service that simply takes my RSS feed updates and sends them to your inboxi
muss ich mir mal anschauen.
nachtrag: bis zu 100 empfänger kostenlos, rrs2mail $9/monat. :(
Applied to social media, this vision suggests that rather than give the user only a feed (a single path through the world of information), we should give the user access to a whole network of trails (interconnected paths through the world of information).
Now Apple is putting the extensive identifiable analytics they collect in the App Store in action. They record every tap and there’s no way to turn it off.
das ist schon ein bisschen erschreckend, vor allem wegen …
The data is associated with your account and unencrypted.
mike masnick:
But, as Godier’s piece notes, protocols are… boring. They change slowly (for a good reason, because you need stability to build on). They tend to change by consensus, which is messy. And rather than having billion dollar companies throwing a whole massive engineering team at making everything work, in the protocol world, we rely on constant experimentation by anyone who wants to experiment.
The open web of the nineties didn’t win because the tools were better. It won because a critical mass of people decided that the alternative, a handful of AOL-style walled gardens choosing what everyone saw, was not the future they wanted. Then they built their way out of it. Slowly, unglamorously, in rooms that looked a lot like this one.
Whether atproto ends up being the thing, or a stepping stone to the thing, I don’t know. Nobody in the room claimed to know. But the work is real, the apps are shipping, and the people building them are taking it seriously without taking themselves seriously. That combination is rare, and historically, it’s the one that wins.
Put those bits of information together and what you have is not an “American-Proud Design”, but a phone designed in China, made in China, with the vast majority of parts sourced from China. I’m failing to find any stirring of American pride within me. I’ve certainly felt it before, so I can confirm that it is absent at this time.
abgesehen davon das federico viticci hier klüg über die neue siri nachdenkt (siehe zitat), hat er ein paar sehr tolle fotos an den artikel geklebt. insbesondere das bild von john ternus und tim cook sieht so ausgedacht aus, dass es fast zu promtig als wahr sein könnte. isses aber nicht.
The new Siri AI is, of course, reminiscent of a chatbot at a surface level. And yet unlike Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini, the chatbot is not the product here: the chatbot is merely one of the shapes the new Siri AI can take. “It’s a feature, not a product”, Jobs would quip. The new Siri uses a collection of LLMs to deliver a personal assistant experience that, unlike others, can tap into the rich tapestry of device context and app data that other chatbots can’t aspire to. It can work with voice, it can work with text; it can be a glassy bubble in the Dynamic Island, and it can be an app. I saw Siri pull up messages from months prior and compare responses in tables generated on the spot. I saw Siri cross-reference an Apple note against an email and provide a useful response in about five seconds. It was Siri, but it also didn’t feel like Siri.
(via)
beim typographischen fundstück vom 12.06.2026 habe ich einiges über peek und cloppenburg gelernt, was ich zwar nie wissen wollte, jetzt aber doch weiss.
instagrämer, find ich auch gut.
Das Gedankenspiel, was eigentlich anders wäre, wenn Frauen an der Macht wären, führt Ladies First in eine Welt, in der Frauen sich komplett egoistisch verhalten und nur auf ihr eigenes Wohl bedacht sind. Sie übernehmen keine Verantwortung für Sorgearbeit, belegen selbstverständlich alle Führungspositionen, fördern sich nur gegenseitig. Männer betrachten sie als ungleichwertig, als Lustobjekte, die hübsch anzusehen, aber nicht ernstzunehmend sind.
Selbst als Spiegel des Patriarchats wäre das äußerst plump und vielleicht in den 1950ern als gelungene Satire durchgegangen.